Hi Henning, Henning Nielsen Lund wrote:
Hi Henning,
Hi' Scott
Henning Nielsen Lund wrote:
And a little question... do you know if it is going to include functions (so we can check how many functions we need to implement - that are not part of clib2 or newlib)?
Ouch. You want a call stack graph, or similar. I'd be impressed if the other tool does that, considering it's spanning languages..hekc, I'd just be impressed, we'll leave it at that.
I don't know what the other tool does, but I hope that it is able to do it ;-)
Belx just claimed he can do it, although I took a quick look at the mentioned tool. I seem to remember talking to someone about that Linux distro (SourceMage) in AW IRC...the mentioned tool looks like a combination of gentoo portage + portage tools from the brief look at it I took.
Regarding newlib/clib2 dependencies (to Belxjander), I'd expect any sort of call stack the shrunk down to a single instance of functions used in glibc would be ideal, if you're able to do it...preferably with their prototypes (why not hope for it 'all'? ;-), at which point the mentioned comparison/verification of implemented functions can be checked against AOS newlib or clib2. Not to mention the fact that in worst case, man pages and Linux docs are easily enough accessible, versus trying to build the tool on top of newlib.
I also sent the last email prior to reading this one, so not sure if the 'base' dependencies list was useful or not. If not, sorry, back to lurk mode I go :-(
no problem, if You could get OOo2 beta for gentoo and make the same with that, could it be usefull ;-)
Yes, that would be good. I even knew that (OOo 2). Sorry, I'm a dork, I'll see if I can get that tonight.
Scott
Scott
Openoffice-os4 mailing list Openoffice-os4@samfundet.no https://lists.samfundet.no/mailman/listinfo/openoffice-os4