Hello Ole-Egil On 08/01/2005, you wrote:
Christophe Ochal wrote:
4. SVN vs. CVS: although i'm one of the fans of SVN i believe that if you guys feel more comfortable with CVS and it will let us to start rapidly, then you should use it. In the meanwhile SVN could be a side project (in a SourceForge perspective too...)
I still think we should start on a smaller thing before we tackle OOo, but the most important part of it all is getting organised.
There are many dependancies. Just pick one ;-)
Dmake is already done.... Well, there's always neon, seems OOo also uses it ;)
Personal opinion on feasible roadplan: If we go for 1.9, we'll have to work on dependencies and making sure all the portable (everything except the OS/GUI abstraction layers) compile out of the box while following the upstream development. At some point, upstream is going to start freezing parts of the abstraction layers (for all I know this could have happened already, but I doubt it), from there on in we need to focus on those.
Finding this out shouldn't be too hard, it's just a matter of mailing the right people & asking the right questions. If nobody objects to T_Power's suggestion i'll be setting up the voting booth up monday for head honcho, that person can then form a team arround him to manage things. Anyone willing to take that role should speak up. Note that that person will *NOT* be responsible for the project itself, he will still need to form a team to support his function & workload. Regards -- Amon_Re Christophe Ochal Hoge Buizemont 168 9500 Geraardsbergen, Belgium Mobile: 0032 (0)479/46 45 74 http://www.kefren.be http://www.metalfest.be