I've never managed any projects other than my own (some are commercialized however so I can't say I couldn't do a good job ;-) anyone that can break down a project this big into workable steps is qualified in my book ;-).
----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Fraser" argo@urswerks.homeip.net To: openoffice-os4@samfundet.no Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 2:36 PM Subject: Re: This seems to be going no-where (was Re: [OO.org-OS4] Re: Name)
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 07:47:21 -0500, stephane richard srichard@adaworld.com wrote:
I agree with your opinion here. These are all issues that do need to be discussed, no two ways about that, however, since these are issues that need a final word/say to have them resolved, that won't happen until we do have an organizational structure in place. So we can send messages back and forth like this, but it's all we're going to achieve until somebody can "in a politically correct fashion" tell us to "shut the hell up and this is what it's gonna be so to speak ;-).
I think we are already there. I like the council idea and the workgroups as I stated earlier. We need to think about it from the top down, first I think. Once we've contacted OO.org about the port and know specifics from their end. It can be compared with what we have. Once we have that big picture we'll be in a better position to move forward.
So, who volunteered so we can vote for our fearless leader(s) ? hehe
Is that your hat in the ring? I'll toss mine in, for what it's worth. I'm a also a big fan of choice, along with Plan B.
Openoffice-os4 mailing list Openoffice-os4@samfundet.no https://lists.samfundet.no/mailman/listinfo/openoffice-os4