31 Mar
2005
31 Mar
'05
6:50 p.m.
On 2005/03/31, Hans-Joerg Frieden wrote:
It might be a better idea to have a "server process" that does the device handling, and communicate via messages with any opener. If you need to have opener-specific data, it might also be a better idea to do this in the interface instead of the library base - this is directly supported by the system and not as hacky in nature as cloning a library base.
I dont like the "server process" method... when moving lots of data that method will be really slow becorse it has to enter wait state so offen.
I have looked at clone interface, this really looks promessing especially if I can use one of the reserved fields in InterfaceData struct as a userdata field..
Regards Rene W. Olsen