31 Mar
2005
31 Mar
'05
6:50 p.m.
On 2005/03/31, Hans-Joerg Frieden wrote:
It might be a better idea to have a "server
process" that does the
device handling, and communicate via messages with any opener. If you
need to have opener-specific data, it might also be a better idea to do
this in the interface instead of the library base - this is directly
supported by the system and not as hacky in nature as cloning a library
base.
I dont like the "server process" method... when moving lots of data that method
will be really slow
becorse it has to enter wait state so offen.
I have looked at clone interface, this really looks promessing especially if I can use one
of the
reserved fields in InterfaceData struct as a userdata field..
Regards
Rene W. Olsen