Thomas Frieden wrote:
Hi,
Scott W wrote:
while useful in it's own right, should be clearly marked as either a legacy doc (for example, glibc is not going to be used for AOS OOo port AFAIK....umm, and it isn't 'command line parsing', although it's possible they use GNU getopt functionality _from_ glibc..)
I assume they use getopt_long, which isn't part of the standard C library... clib2 has getopt...
, it shoudl clearly state these are the _LINUX_ dependencies rather than AOS', or be marked as: 'Linux': <dependency AOS: <replacement, equivalent, or porting status>
Good idea...
It already does, in the paragraph at the top of the page it clearly states that these dependencies are for Linux (until someone made an AOS section at the bottom which appears to be almost a copy of the Linux version).
Mark