- Openoffice-os4 - Studentersamfundet

Misc Wiki updates to OS Checks Page
by Scott W 13 Jan '05

13 Jan '05

A few updates, fill in if anything is missing you're aware of (which of course there is) ;-) http://amigaopenoffice.org/index.php?option=com_wikidoc&task=viewcontent&do… Anyone know the versions for: gcc/g++ going to be used? version of STLPort Also, Hans, is your dl*() wrapper code available anywhere currently? Thanks, Scott PS- wikis are NOT supposed to make you write your own HTML!

3 2

Re: [OO.org-OS4] Misc Wiki updates to OS Checks Page
by hnl_dk＠ribekatedralskole.dk 13 Jan '05

13 Jan '05

I have changed some things, but can not reply (as I am at work). Will write to the list when I get home. Best regards, hnl_dk - Henning Nielsen Lund

1 0

updates to Wiki- Build Environment
by Scott W 13 Jan '05

13 Jan '05

All, http://amigaopenoffice.org/index.php?option=com_wikidoc&task=viewcontent&do… Added new section listing 'Amiga OS Software Requirements and Equivalents' still questions on some, read/edit/correct...just don't make fun of my sad HTML skills ;-) Thanks, Scott

1 0

Updates to AOOo Wiki- Build Environment
by Scott Wegener 13 Jan '05

13 Jan '05

All, http://amigaopenoffice.org/index.php?option=com_wikidoc&task=viewcontent&do… Added new section listing 'Amiga OS Software Requirements and Equivalents' still questions on some, read/edit/correct...just don't make fun of my sad HTML skills ;-) Thanks, Scott

1 0

misc wiki updates to OS Checks page
by Scott Wegener 13 Jan '05

13 Jan '05

A few updates, fill in if anything is missing you're aware of (which of course there is) ;-) http://amigaopenoffice.org/index.php?option=com_wikidoc&task=viewcontent&do… Anyone know the versions for: gcc/g++ going to be used? version of STLPort Also, Hans, is your dl*() wrapper code available anywhere currently? Thanks, Scott PS- wikis are NOT supposed to make you write your own HTML!

1 0

Website and documentation
by Andy Hall 12 Jan '05

12 Jan '05

Hello, I'd like to propose that in an effort to get a bit better organised, that we should start putting together a website. I'm not talking about a pretty look-at-us-we've-got-a-logo-and-cool-project-name site, but rather something that we can use to document decisions and developer info, a single point of reference. Even though nothing has yet started, I would like to get into the habit now, with research and organisational issues. I'm putting myself forward to help get this off the ground. -- Thanks, Andy Hall

22 105

Voting extension ?
by Timothy Cameron 12 Jan '05

12 Jan '05

Hello all There are 62 members on this mailing list. Currently only 17 (27%) votes have been cast in the management poll. Voter turn out is slow. (and Bush is not even involved :)) Kind regards Tim (T_Power)

7 8

Updated resources section on the wiki
by Christophe Ochal 12 Jan '05

12 Jan '05

Hello, http://amigaopenoffice.org/index.php?option=com_wikidoc&task=view&docid=5&I… Kind regards -- Amon_Re Christophe Ochal Hoge Buizemont 168 9500 Geraardsbergen, Belgium Mobile: 0032 (0)479/46 45 74 http://www.kefren.be http://www.metalfest.be

1 0

Re: [OO.org-OS4] Platform Targets ? (was: Re: Pre-organisatorial note)
by "Daniel Weßling" 12 Jan '05

12 Jan '05

openoffice-os4(a)samfundet.no schrieb am 11.01.05 08:06:57: >>Well, OOo is supposed to be compileable with 2.95, so i don't see why >> we'd have to port GCC 3.4 to OS3.x aswell. >> >> > Do you want us to make a classic version too? I thought it was OS4 only. > I was thinking about that, too. IMO it doesn't make sence to support the 68k (for technical and political reasons). But that's just my opinion. Do we have to define a target here ? Are we strictly talking about AOS4 (which is/was my impression, and I'd go for it), or are people on the list more open to other suggestions ?

13 36

Pre-organisatorial note.
by Peter Bengtsson 12 Jan '05

12 Jan '05

Quick note, Before we get _too_ organised, I would like to insert a quick note. A number of messages back someone suggested we divide the OOo source into subprojects, but before we do this we probably ought to look at the dependencies. If OOo requires Neon, then "Neon" is probably a good subproject to begin with, not "OOo WebDAV". Some things like might be ported, other replaced, but all in all the best subproject to begin with might be "OOo dependencies". Oh, and my AW nick is "Tesla" (unobviously :). -Peter aka. Archprogrammer Reality is for people who cannot face ScienceFiction. Only lefthanded people are in their right minds.

22 72