Hello Peter
Peter Bengtsson wrote at 18.01.2005 19:01:29:
On 2005-01-18, Christophe Ochal wrote:
Also, Archprogrammer, could you take over the csh port to gcc from TonyW?
Ok. Will do.
(You heard that, TonyW. Mail me a quick summary of what you have found/done so far and I will take it from there.)
I will also take the opportunity to write a bit about the OOo dependencies. After examining the code a bit I do not think it is realistic to make a complete dependency graph by friday. I would instead suggest that we concentrate on identifying good candidates for initial ports. This would mean modules/libraries with few or no sub-dependencies and which we can test as we go along.
One example of such a project could be to port and test the UNO framework which is used pervasively throughout the OOo code. (This requires some more investigation, but I think it might be a good candidate)
Comments? Opinions? Corrections? Rants?
I fully agree with you, it makes MUCH MORE sense to divide the whole branch into a lot of smaller projects, so this way we have both the ported applications (like curl ie. :) available for the community and also get a better "feeling" how this all works together.
We should use sourceforge to add/modify the divided projects, and keep the main OO branch out there until we can really start to take the big babe. Just my 2 cents.
Regards,