On 2005-01-07, Christophe Ochal wrote:
<SNIP>
Also, about Neon for SVN. Do we really need this initially? I use SVN on my SPARC and the standalone svnserver works well. For security reasons, we should probably look into other protocols (or tunnel svn over ssh) - but for an initial port we could perhaps build a minimal SVN server/client set with limited protocol support.
Actually, the main focus atm is just a SVN client, the server will not be a priority
Well, that was my thought. Neon is for WebDAV clients (if I remember correctly) and is consequently used by the SVN client. So cutting WebDAV support from the client might be a possibility for an initial version.
(But, as I wrote, this might not desierable in the long term.)
-Peter aka. Archprogrammer
Reality is for people who cannot face ScienceFiction. Only lefthanded people are in their right minds.