Re: [OO.org-OS4] Re: Resources list

Hi,

Scott W wrote:

while useful in it's own right, should be clearly marked as either a legacy doc (for example, glibc is not going to be used for AOS OOo port AFAIK....umm, and it isn't 'command line parsing', although it's possible they use GNU getopt functionality _from_ glibc..)

I assume they use getopt_long, which isn't part of the standard C library... clib2 has getopt...

, it shoudl clearly state these are the _LINUX_ dependencies rather than AOS', or be marked as: 'Linux': <dependency AOS: <replacement, equivalent, or porting status>

Good idea...

Regards,