Ole-Egil Hvitmyren wrote:
Christophe Ochal wrote:
Hello Jürgen
About the vote: I am not pretty happy with the things going on here. There is simply not enough information available to make a vote yet, the notification time is/was way to short. Did the IRC conference take place today ? If so, I missed it, and I guess to announce something like this has to reserve at least some time to plan the meeting (at least 1-2 days ahead).
I think the voting was mentioned since yesterday, the sole reason why i suggested it was because there simply is no direction inhere at all, getting someone to steer this in a direction seems to me the best solution.
And if we don't get someone to officially lead us soon I'm going to keep swamping you in explanations, ideas and suggestions until you just silently give up and I become the shadow government :-P
We could of course extend the time limit on the vote another 12-24 hours just to make certain everyone has their say in the matter. And asking follow-up questions before voting is allowed, I presume.
All, I know some of you are 'antsy,' but at this stage of the game, I don't think anyone here knows anyone....setting up an IRC meeting with interested parties and taking a vote then might be a better idea, or just making the 'duration' of this 'unknown taking initial tenure' a short period of time....that way it'll allow someone 'to go to,' but if it doesn't work out because no one knows anyone so it's 'picking out of a hat,' it can be revisited in a month or so...
Scott