28 Jan
2005
28 Jan
'05
1:07 p.m.
On 2005/01/28, stephane richard wrote:
Well I'm not sure why it's no no...but I would assume that if you can extract the functionality you need from clib2 without trailing any clib2 dependant code (hence if the functionality you need happens to be isolated and non dependant on the rest of the library) then it could be worth it :-).
clib2 need to be initalized before use, some function migth work but there is no garenti :-/
anyway if no one has a smart trick I have to rip the source code from clib2.
Regards Rene W. Olsen