Hello Hans-Joerg
On 11/01/2005, you wrote:
Christophe Ochal wrote:
There are other considerations. For example, we have pthreads for OS 4. Threading could be very well done with that. Is there anything like that for 3.1? AROS? MorphOS? If yes, fine, but if not, additional effort is required to provide them.
I have no idea... these are things wich need looking into at a later state tho.
I think we shouldn't look into these. If any MorphOS programmer joins, they could. They are better suited because they know the platform and what is available. Without someone that actually has the platform and knows it I don't think that this would work.
I didn't mean that we should do the implementation for MOS or AROS, i meant that when we start coding we should look at the things needed & the coders available.
If for instance there are MOS or AROS devs particitating, a short discussion with them about this could help them (and vice versa), not that we (as in OS4 users/devs) should be writing code for MOS specifics, leave that to those who know the system.
Regards