9 Nov
2005
9 Nov
'05
2:14 p.m.
Rene W. Olsen wrote:
On 2005/11/09, Ole-Egil Hvitmyren wrote:
Well, I guess you haven't read www.microsoft.com today :-P
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms05-053.mspx
(last year it was libjpg, earlier this year it was libpng and I might
have "accidentally" predicted that this wasn't the last graphics
rendering security hole in Windows we would hear about :-P )
But this can be fixed by someone in the OS4 team,
or no?
It's a bit strange that we haven't heard anything more on this ;-)
Well normally you done go around annocing bugs Any way in the mean time I have been accepted as a
Beta tester, so I ofcoarse reported the bug,
nothing more I can do as I dont have CVS access
Ok, that's fine. You've done your job, that's for sure.
Any chance you could help me populate the dependency database? I'm not
that interested in the person/role parts, just fill in all the projects
you know we need for some reason or other, then link them together. The
list/search is still missing, and it would be cool to have a tree-based
view where you could click on a project and see the rest of the tree
with that project as root node. Wouldn't even be difficult. So I think
the list/search functionality is going to be tree based. I might have to
limit the number of levels in a branch (to avoid circular paths), but
that shouldn't be a big problem. If we have ten levels of dependencies
on the screen we should have a good idea of how big an undertaking
anything would be :-P
I'm interested in more than one root node, maybe invite the mozilla
people to have a look later on as well. It's always interesting to see
where the pressure should be applied first.