Yes, it is one of the things that have been replaced
by a Java
>> Could you investigate the OO.org
Java requirements, and then take a
>> look at the state of JAmiga (speak to the devs if necessary), if its
>> not far enough advanced, nor likely to be soon, please take a look at
>> Kaffe/cacao/Jikes/etc and make an evaluation as to the best solution
>> for our needs and report back, we can then decide what to do.
> OK, will do.
Don't want to stop anyone, but maybe... as there
"is" already JAmiga...
why not try to get gcj to work?
I think that was the point of my request no? basically he needs to go and
find out exactly what OO.org's Java requirements are, if JAmiga can meet
those requirements, job done, otherwise find the best solution that will
take the least amount of time to port/bring up to scratch.
As I understand it we currently have some (68k) based Java compilers and
from Thomas' message we could have a PPC one, and maybe a library fairly
easily (gcj based), however I dont know if its that simple, do we need the
GUI classes, do we need the JVM etc?
So Tony gets to investigate first, report back, then we decide the best
next step Java wise.
Worst case scenario is we need to port a full Java SDK/JVM etc