openoffice-os4@samfundet.no schrieb am 11.01.05 14:08:45:
Daniel Weßling wrote:
>I in my opinion thinks that we should not base oo on aos4 but on aos3.1 - in this case we would have the possibility to add more coders from the mos/classic os + aros side, which would help getting ready faster. Later on I would suppose to make it aos4 as in the second step. > > Is there any MorphOS/AROS coder on the list? I've seen complaints about "locking them out" on various (mostly german) fora, but so far haven't seen anyone actually asking.
In any case, it might be possible to cross-develop on all targets at once, but I for one cannot develop for 3.1 - I neither have a system to run it on anymore, nor do I have any compiler or similar that produces 68k.
There are other considerations. For example, we have pthreads for OS 4. Threading could be very well done with that. Is there anything like that for 3.1? AROS? MorphOS? If yes, fine, but if not, additional effort is required to provide them.
Regards,
-- Hans-Joerg Frieden, Hans-JoergF@hyperion-entertainment.biz - I-amar prestar aen / han mathon ne nen han mathon ne chae / a han noston ned 'wilith
- Hello Hans-Joerg -hope I could say so ;-) - sure there are no MOS/AROS coders now on the list and sure I understand not only in your view that AOS4 should be the target, but its not my intention to say: give it out for those who didn't help (OS sided) but to get more "helping hands" ... you understand?!?
