On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 17:39:43 +0100, Daniel Weßling dwessling@web.de wrote:
Hello Hans-Joerg -hope I could say so ;-) - sure there are no MOS/AROS coders now on the list and sure I understand not only in your view that AOS4 should be the target, but its not my intention to say: give it out for those who didn't help (OS sided) but to get more "helping hands" ... you understand?!?
Helping hands are good. As to the "not my intention to say: give it out for those who didn't help (OS sided)", OO.org is an open source project. The source code is available to anyone. We, the people here didn't help OO.org get to where it is today, but we can get a copy of the source code. The code from this porting project is going to be a part of that, thus available to Mos and AROS groups should they wish use it. Having them on board would lend more helping hand to the common code areas.
It would seem that if the scope of the project is to be big then just AOS 4, we'd need programmers from Mos, AROS, Classic to handle the issue specific to each.
Oh, it could be that this is being perceived as AOS 4.0 only, which is why we only have AOS 4 people.